soc-pe-bot
commented
4 months ago Team's Response
Rejected as it was always clear as a group that the planned enhancements were meant to be carried out across all the input fields, as it would be very inconsistent in the product if the enhancements were to only be done on a small subset of features. We see no benefit in breaking the planned enhancements down into subsets.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: 
According to the guideline provided in the website above, it stated that each enhancement should be
specific, describing the feature flaw it addresses and how exactly the feature will be changed.
The two enhancements mentioned above, which I have screenshotted, are not specific and are too general. They do not describe the specific feature flaws that your team is planning to address.
Besides that, according to the guideline provided here, if any of the enhancements in the list combines more than one enhancement, it can be reported as a documentation bug.
These two possible future enhancements stated in the developer guide are quite generic, it never specify the input fields which that the data validation need to be improve or error messages for which command should be more specific. Hence, I feel these two enhancements might be involving more than one enhancement for each of them.