Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
In my opinion:
e-03E SEEDLING -- It could be a little more perky, but I don't think it looks
doomed... Not sure it's worth changing.
e-198 HAIRCUT -- I think it's fine, don't change.
e-970 POT OF FOOD -- don't know
But, when I search for the KDDI and SoftBank names, some of the results do look
like
the current glyph (without handles):
http://images.google.com/images?gbv=2&hl=en&q=鍋&btnG=Search+Images
http://images.google.com/images?q=なべ&gbv=2&hl=en&sa=G&imgsz=
e-978 DONUT -- it should be possible to make a small change to make this look
more
like a single torus
e-B59 SLEEPING SIGN
Varied sizes of Z like seen with KDDI / SB might more look like a sleeping
sign.
-> I agree. SoftBank's image, minus the shadow effect, or KDDI's last animation
frame
(only visible in the HTML version of the chart) should be a good template.
I don't have an opinion about e-040 CHERRY BLOSSOM, e-052 TANGERINE, e-4D9
KIMONO, e-
7E8 SHIP.
Original comment by markus.icu
on 28 Jan 2009 at 10:44
e-970 POT OF FOOD
Right, there are ones without handles. Typically, however, they have, and that
is a stereotype of the cookware
used for this cuisine. I am fine, however, with the current design.
All of the design issue listed here are about fine tuning in my view and just
nice to have.
Original comment by k...@apple.com
on 29 Jan 2009 at 1:14
> All of the design issue listed here are about fine tuning in my view and just
nice
to have.
Right, but this is the week to change the font to our liking, and to give it
the best
shot for the proposal. After next Tuesday's UTC discussion, we should change
the font
design (and character names and code points) only as instructed by the UTC. So
let's
settle and implement now what we want to change, or agree to basically never
change
these things.
Original comment by markus.icu
on 29 Jan 2009 at 5:23
e-198 HAIRCUT : I agree with Markus. Let's leave this as is.
e-B59 SLEEPING SIGN : It seems there is an agreement on this one.
e-978 DONUT : I agree that small change will make it look like single donut.
If making it a plane donut
improves the recognizability on low res, it might worth trying on the other
hand. What do you think Max ?
e-03E SEEDLING : I prefer it being a bit more perky.
e-970 POT OF FOOD : Other than points I mentioned, I think having two handles
make it look more like a
pot rather than a bowl.
Opinions for other emojis ?
e-4D9 KIMONO : As being a kimono lover, I feel a bit strongly about this.
e-052 TANGERINE
e-040 CHERRY BLOSSOM
e-7E8 SHIP
Talking about low res, do we care if glyphs are recognizable enough in low res
? If so what is the target
resolution ? c.f. Dekome (HTML based emoji) is typically 20x20.
Original comment by kida.ya...@gmail.com
on 30 Jan 2009 at 5:50
These all appear to be fine-tuning style issues that don't affect either
semantics or recognizability in the UTC
proposal document code chart. I would like to batch these in with feedback
collected from UTC next week.
Original comment by loft...@apple.com
on 30 Jan 2009 at 6:40
Original comment by markus.icu
on 30 Jan 2009 at 10:47
Original comment by markus.icu
on 9 Feb 2009 at 8:47
A number of glyph changes and refinements have been made since our earlier
discussions. I think this is done.
Original comment by markus.icu
on 27 Apr 2010 at 8:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
markus.icu
on 28 Jan 2009 at 1:22