Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
Forgot to mention, that this issue was created from feedback originally
provided by
Stefan Küng. See:
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=34624
Original comment by schoenho...@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2008 at 8:45
[deleted comment]
Code changes
Original comment by schoenho...@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2008 at 8:52
Attachments:
Original comment by azizatif
on 22 Aug 2008 at 6:55
@schoenholzer: Thanks. I've applied the patch in r26. There are still some
rough
edges so I'm not closing this right now. Some observed problems were:
- The search spans all issue fields, including field names!
- As a result of the above, it's not immediately and visually obvious how the
currently found item matched.
- The search uses ordinal compairson and I'm not sure if that's the best
default.
- There is no visual cue when a search doesn't find anything.
Original comment by azizatif
on 22 Aug 2008 at 7:17
Tried out r26. While searching kind of works, I think it would be better to
filter
the issues, i.e. show only those which match the search string.
Original comment by tortoisesvn
on 22 Aug 2008 at 1:30
patch attached which changes the 'search' to a 'filter'.
Remember that this is my first step in C# :)
Original comment by tortoisesvn
on 22 Aug 2008 at 2:03
Attachments:
I made another patch to fix the problem mentioned by Atif.
But I would go with the solution of @tortoisesvn. Filtering is a cleaner
solution.
Original comment by schoenho...@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2008 at 2:47
Attachments:
@tortoisesvn: I've applied the patch in r29. Thanks and it's really not bad for
a
first step in C#. :)
Original comment by azizatif
on 22 Aug 2008 at 3:11
Original comment by azizatif
on 22 Aug 2008 at 3:11
The basic request of this issue is not addressed. There is search box for
searching/filtering through issues therefore I am closing this issue as fixed.
Any
further enhancements or problems with the search/filtering function should be
reported as new issues.
@tortoisesvn, @schoenholzer: Thanks again.
Original comment by azizatif
on 22 Aug 2008 at 3:18
@atif: The basic request of this issue is *not* addressed.
Then why closing?
Original comment by schoenho...@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2008 at 3:56
> The basic request of this issue is *not* addressed.
What's missing? A search box is there and one can basically use it to find
issues.
Original comment by azizatif
on 22 Aug 2008 at 3:59
Is it now adressed or not?
Look at your comment 12
Original comment by schoenho...@gmail.com
on 22 Aug 2008 at 4:07
I see what you mean now. That was a typo on my part. It should have read, "The
basic
request of this issue *is* addressed". Sorry about the confusion.
Original comment by azizatif
on 22 Aug 2008 at 4:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
schoenho...@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2008 at 8:17