Closed nashif closed 4 months ago
@stanislaw why is this failing, the syntax is very strict :)
@stanislaw why is this failing, the syntax is very strict :)
I think the exporter don't like the additional line in 1383 and 1439 :smiley:
@stanislaw is it possible to put sections in smaller documents instead of maintaining everything in 1 single document?
@stanislaw is it possible to put sections in smaller documents instead of maintaining everything in 1 single document?
@mettta and I have started designing the include-able section fragments feature. For now, you could simply create one more .sdoc document and collect the semaphore requirements there.
cc @romkell
@tobiaskaestner ok, pushed another revision. I am trying to avoid making those turn into interface requirements by not going into the details of the implementation, its not easy and you find yourself specifying APIs instead of descrbing required functionality, i.e. functional requirements.
Just noticed, that while I was reviewing and responding in part to @gregshue comments @nashif force pushed a new revision which did separate my replies from the original comments. Apologies for that.
Just noticed, that while I was reviewing and responding in part to @gregshue comments @nashif force pushed a new revision which did separate my replies from the original comments. Apologies for that.
no worries.
traceability to tests:
Expand on semaphore requirements.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif anas.nashif@intel.com