search

zero3nna / Optima-PPM

Hitec Optima PPM Output
9 stars 5 forks source link

S.Bus protocol #2

Closed tloki closed 6 years ago

tloki commented 6 years ago

It would be nice to support an S.Bus protocol (which is a bit "faster") than PPM.

Is this possible? Also, could it be supported, even in theory?

sdriessens commented 6 years ago

It is possible to implement S.Bus on the slave, but it won’t offer much benefit. The master only sends updated frames at a fixed interval around 50 Hz.

Scott

From: Tomislav Lokotar notifications@github.com Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 3:14:03 AM To: zero3nna/Optima-PPM Cc: Subscribed Subject: [zero3nna/Optima-PPM] S.Bus protocol (#2)

It would be nice to support an S.Bus protocol (which is a bit "faster") than PPM.

Is this possible? Also, could it be supported, even in theory?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/zero3nna/Optima-PPM/issues/2, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEb5iX0POKXBfoACEle-JeKtAk0_BLj-ks5tufBjgaJpZM4Tv4Mw.

tloki commented 6 years ago

Well, yes that would be one huge waste of time, totally forgot about it!

EDIT: Does this also reflect in case of a newer Aurora 9X (as one is marketed as having 7ms frame time, or about 140Hz), or by master you mean a "master component" of the receiver?

julioghigi commented 5 years ago

By master his mean a master component, there are two microcontrolers on the receiver, the master and the slave, we only modify the slave.