Closed tomato151 closed 3 years ago
Geometry.Charge
, as is shown in the paper in question, you add a charge g
on the gate, and remove the same charge from the system.I notice that if the neutral system has 1148 electrons, when using
%block Geometry.Charge
plane -2.0 charge
gauss 1. 2. Ang
0. 20.0 0. Ang
0. 1. 0.
%endblock Geometry.Charge
There is a line in output
transiesta: Charge distribution, target = 1150.00000
How do the program realize this? Is the Fermi level of the electrodes shifted?
Thank you!
- The system is charge-neutral in total when using
Geometry.Charge
, as is shown in the paper in question, you add a chargeg
on the gate, and remove the same charge from the system.
In the above case you put -2
electrons on the gate, and then add 2 electrons to the system. Effectively charging the system, while the total simulation cell is charge neutral (due to the gate).
Thanks, I have understood.
Hi, @zerothi, I try to calculate the electronic transport properties of a graphene nanojunction with a charge gate using the Geometry.Charge block and I have two questions about the calculation details.
Should the option SlabDipoleCorrection be chosen? In the Method part of your paper published in PCCP the slab dipole correction was used, however I did not find this option in the fdf file.
If I put a charge -e in the gate plane, how to induce a charge +e in the graphene nanojunction to keep the whole system (the graphene nanojunction + gate) neutral?
Thanks for your kind help. Regards, Haoyang