search

zeta-chain / node

ZetaChain’s blockchain node and an observer validator client
https://zetachain.com
MIT License
168 stars 108 forks source link

test: add wait for block to tss migration test #2931

Closed kingpinXD closed 1 month ago

kingpinXD commented 1 month ago

Description

The change might improve the success frequency of the TSS-migration-test on the CI .

The pr adds a loop to make sure the new TSS is set before trying to migrate funds.

How Has This Been Tested?

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough ## Walkthrough The pull request introduces enhancements to the end-to-end testing framework by adding functionality to wait for TSS (Threshold Signature Scheme) generation before executing migration logic. Specifically, it modifies the `TestMigrateTSS` function to include a wait for TSS generation and introduces two new methods in the `E2ERunner` struct to facilitate this wait. These changes aim to improve the reliability of TSS-related operations during migration processes. ## Changes | File Path | Change Summary | |--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | e2e/e2etests/test_migrate_tss.go | Added a call to `r.WaitForTssGeneration(2)` in the `TestMigrateTSS` function to ensure TSS generation completes before migration. | | e2e/runner/zeta.go | Introduced two methods in `E2ERunner`: `WaitForTssGeneration(n int64)` for waiting on TSS generations and `waitForTssGeneration(n int64)` for checking TSS history. Also added comments for clarity. | ## Possibly related PRs - **#2844**: Enhances the TSS voting mechanism by incorporating a public key, relevant to the changes in the main PR involving TSS generation. - **#2894**: Increases the gas limit for TSS vote transactions, which relates to the main PR's focus on TSS generation during migration. ## Suggested labels `E2E` ## Suggested reviewers - lumtis - fbac - swift1337 - brewmaster012 - ws4charlie - skosito

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 66.39%. Comparing base (03435b4) to head (53eb719). Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files [![Impacted file tree graph](https://app.codecov.io/gh/zeta-chain/node/pull/2931/graphs/tree.svg?width=650&height=150&src=pr&token=JABAIMO8MP&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zeta-chain)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/zeta-chain/node/pull/2931?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zeta-chain) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #2931 +/- ## ======================================== Coverage 66.39% 66.39% ======================================== Files 389 389 Lines 21758 21758 ======================================== Hits 14447 14447 Misses 6584 6584 Partials 727 727 ```