Closed jwerle closed 4 years ago
that's alot of work to allow :: here, why not use a different symbol?
I am currently using _
as a separator. It isn't a show stopper at all. I had the idea using ::
instead and wanted to open an issue here to see what your thoughts were.
We can close if this does not makes sense or the effort is too large
: should be ok
It might make sense when it has functionality, but I'm not sure what that would be.
Just allowing a path separator :: that doesn't separate anything creates alot of confusing corner cases
Yeah lets just close this for now
I can see much benefit from allowing one to do:
allowing:
ZZ currently complains that it can't find the module 'namespace::library' because of the
::
contained in the name.@aep what are your thoughts on support something like this? I hope this makes sense