Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Looks like you're right. A detail I missed in the test vector documents is that
the keys, IVs, and outputs are all little-endian. The endianness shouldn't
affect the security of the cipher, but of course it does affect the
compatibility. I'll definitely implement the fix, and I'll likely rename the
current implementation to "rabbit-legacy", or something along the lines, for
people who still need the existing behavior.
Original comment by Jeff.Mott.OR
on 3 Dec 2012 at 8:41
> A detail I missed in the test vector documents is that the keys, IVs, and
outputs are all little-endian.
What is much more important to fix, is that you seem to have used the key and
the IV with *different* endian-nesses. (Sorry to repeat, but your comment
didn't make it obvious that you noticed this part of my report).
Original comment by ronkamin...@gmail.com
on 3 Dec 2012 at 11:25
Fixed in r556.
Original comment by Jeff.Mott.OR
on 9 Dec 2012 at 2:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ronkamin...@gmail.com
on 29 Nov 2012 at 11:44Attachments: