zhanghai / MaterialFiles

Material Design file manager for Android
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=me.zhanghai.android.files
GNU General Public License v3.0
5.77k stars 386 forks source link

Hall of Shame #291

Open zhanghai opened 4 years ago

zhanghai commented 4 years ago

Pleaes help report these copycat apps on Google Play. I believe they are violating the Repetitive Content policy inside Play Developer Policy.

You can report these apps in Play store app with "Flag as inappropriate", or submit a report form online.

Thanks!

GajenderY commented 4 years ago

Submitted.

slavoyar8601 commented 4 years ago

Submitted

thgoebel commented 4 years ago

Also, I think they violate your license (GPLv3) by not naming you as the original author and not open sourcing their modifications of the source code. (anyway, reported)

gprst commented 4 years ago

It seems that a request to "remove content from Google" regarding "copyright infringement" must be done by the author themselves.

I submitted a ~request~ report, but I think the app would be more likely to be removed from the Play Store if it had legal complaints.

ssssamstrup commented 4 years ago

Please advise to vote the app down in the post above. Submitted and voted the app 1-star with a comment telling about the copying. This way people will see it in the Play store.

J-Jamet commented 4 years ago

You must also install the application before putting 1 * otherwise the google algorithm considers the comment as spam. Uninstall this pale copy right after obviously.

abechief commented 4 years ago

发现了新的抄袭者! https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=x.gen.android.files 以及它的高级版 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=x.genpro.android.files

PrSunflower commented 3 years ago

This is really a shame and very disrespectful 😡, I've flagged the clones as inappropriate.

Also, I think they violate your license (GPLv3) by not naming you as the original author and not open sourcing their modifications of the source code. (anyway, reported)

I was thinking about that too. Legally speaking, the GPL licences oblige publishing copies under the same license, don't they?

Side note: Sorry for the notification above. I copy/pasted the link to this issue in another completely different repository and I didn't know GitHub was going to mention it. I removed the link to this issue but the notification doesn't disappear, it can be deleted if you want.

zhanghai commented 3 years ago

Yes I believe they are not compliant with GPL, but IIRC Google Play asked me for a lawyer if I were to submit a copyright infringement form 😅

I won't be happy with people re-publishing this app mostly as-is, but with ads/paid version, even if they open source their app and comply with GPL anyway 🙃

PrSunflower commented 3 years ago

@zhanghai

Yes I believe they are not compliant with GPL, but IIRC Google Play asked me for a lawyer if I were to submit a copyright infringement form 😅

Oh no, having to work with a lawyer for a simple matter like this... 😕

If you're willing to spend some time maybe you could contact GNU about this. They have instructions dedicated to "violations of the GNU Licenses" so I guess some developers already have had this issue.

I won't be happy with people re-publishing this app mostly as-is, but with ads/paid version, even if they open source their app and comply with GPL anyway 🙃

And yes I totally understand this. If you publish a free/libre app the purpose is for people to use it and maybe even improve it if they have good ideas, not copying everything from the ground and adding malware in the code. 😠

gotmax23 commented 3 years ago

It looks like the second one File Manager Pro 2020 — File Manager was taken down, but the other two are still up.

This seems to be a problem with a couple other FOSS apps as well. It's unfortunate that Google doesn't do anything about it.

ghost commented 3 years ago

Found this one in Play Store File Explorer FTP Server by Corproxy Innovation

No ads but still a GPL violation

shuvashish76 commented 3 years ago

https://support.google.com/legal/troubleshooter/1114905

Screenshot_2021-08-03-19-18-00

According to Google they only accept copyright complaints from content owners or someone officially authorized to act on their behalf. We users cant report from the above link, plus we all know Google doesn't care users' report on play store.

@zhanghai Please report those apps & later mail them comparing with side by side screenshots our original app & those apps.

Thankyou🙏🏿

zhanghai commented 3 years ago

@shuvashish76 It eventually leads me to a DMCA page that warns me I might need a lawyer and may be involved in expensive litigations. I would prefer avoiding that legal risk for just a side project of mine 🙃

image

drwatson221b commented 3 years ago

True. It's futile effort to put on something that isn't a mainstream source of your earnings. Yours is open-source and they won't be able to act on your content anyways as it will be clearly seen that they're the ones who plagiarised your work were they made to reveal their source.

ptalmeida commented 3 years ago

Google is infamous for ignoring problems (scams, copycats, etc.) in its playstore unfortunately.

dariusity commented 3 years ago

Submitted, can I ask you something quickly? Isit possible to add applications with some basic features? And isit possible for me to adjust the height of the columns? The texts seem too far apart and wasting screen pixels. Cheers.

ashjas commented 3 years ago

Reported all three clones.

shuvashish76 commented 2 years ago

@zhanghai Please pin #597

Copied from NewPipe & AmazeFileManager issue.

Nice to have all lists of Copycat apps in one place for future reference. Please double-check the current app list. If ppl submit more such apps, then please edit the list only after verifying them personally.

Thanks!

dmuiX commented 2 years ago

Done

VA1DER commented 2 years ago

It eventually leads me to a DMCA page that warns me I might need a lawyer

They are just trying to scare people from making false claims that they own the copyright. You clearly own the copyright and are entitled to make the claims you do. I encourage you to continue with the takedown request.

ghost commented 2 years ago

Google is infamous for ignoring problems (scams, copycats, etc.) in its playstore unfortunately.

But zhanghai is a Google Employee, so Google shouldn't ignore copycats of his own Project.

lipici commented 2 years ago

Still there, as long as developer dosent open ticket to google its just wasted time from us.

zhanghai commented 2 years ago

But zhanghai is a Google Employee, so Google shouldn't ignore copycats of his own Project.

That's just your assumption. I did and that's not the case.

z8512 commented 2 years ago

Submitted.

J-Jamet commented 1 year ago

What you say is just gratuitous hate.

You really want to spit on the work of someone who gives his time and energy to the community just because he works for a living?

The philosophy of a company does not necessarily reflect that of an employee, even all branches of a single company may not even have the same ambitions. We have to stay factual, we have to remember the AOSP, and think that we are in a capitalist world, whether we like it or not.

Personally, I obviously thank the work of @zhanghai who is exemplary on this project and denounce copycats who do not respect that.

zhanghai commented 1 year ago

Thank you @J-Jamet for speaking up for me. I didn't intend to reply but I feel I need to put a stop to this drama.

I work on Android itself at Google and my code changes are released in AOSP. So if you (@therealbluepandabear) don't like or have no respect for people who work on AOSP (the vast majority of them being at Google) I don't see why you are (presumably) still using AOSP or any Android apps including this one.

I believe the fact that I developed this FOSS project means I am a FOSS developer, regardless of what I do as my day job, your imagination about me, or your personal definition of a "true" FOSS developer. And I'm not happy with someone openly and repeatedly denying me of that.

If you have some opinions towards me personally, this is NOT the right issue or forum to talk about it. If you feel strongly about voicing that opinion you can send that as an email to me so that I can ignore it without disturbing anyone else. But this issue is about others violating the license of this project, and this repository is about the project itself instead of me, so please refrain from voicing your personal opinion on me and distrubing people who subscribed to this or want to actually discuss the subject here. If you keep doing that, I'll have to block you from this forum.

(I see you are actively editing your comment, so please also replace your images with links or just the plain text of those quotes to reduce the distraction it brought to this issue, or I'll do that for you.)

daiaji commented 9 months ago

The GPL agreement is recognized by law in most areas, but Google's attitude is surprising.

"Yes, GPL has legal benefits, but you have to file a lawsuit, otherwise we won't handle it."

To be honest, judging from this attitude, Google is really not very responsible for its own platform.

glibg10b commented 6 months ago

Number 1 is down.

ch3thanhs commented 5 months ago

Found another one - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=me.geosoftech.android

b2sql commented 5 months ago

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sobha.filemanager

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.toolfi.filemanager

Another one. He's shameless enough to charge for "pro" version. Reported.