Thank you very much for your work. After reading your code, it can be found that the channel attention part actually refers to NAFNet, but there is not much comparison with NAFNet in the paper, but chooses restoreformer. Why is this? In fact, it is not only your work. In recent half a year, few papers will be compared with NAFNet, because the effect is really too strong? I'm just getting started in the field of image restoration, so I'm a little curious about this phenomenon, no offense.
Thank you very much for your work. After reading your code, it can be found that the channel attention part actually refers to NAFNet, but there is not much comparison with NAFNet in the paper, but chooses restoreformer. Why is this? In fact, it is not only your work. In recent half a year, few papers will be compared with NAFNet, because the effect is really too strong? I'm just getting started in the field of image restoration, so I'm a little curious about this phenomenon, no offense.