Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2012 at 10:15
Thinking aloud:
depends on, e.g. whether IA can change. If you think a document changes, then
there are some magnetic fields on my disk that concretized it before but no
longer do.
Will think of other examples/counters.
could change pattern of memory traces -> pattern of synapses for closer
connection to current understanding of how memories are formed. We want
something that suggests something can be concretized in the head but it doesn't
need to sound as specific.
Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2012 at 12:19
The strategy for handling documents in IAO was inspired by the FRBR model
http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr1.htm . In that model, a "work" is a
distinct intellectual or artistic creation, which is realized in an
"expression", which in turn is embodied in a "manifestation." The distinction
between works is based on "a significant degree of independent intellectual or
artistic effort" (so, e.g. Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is a different work
than Franco Zeffirelli's motion picture of the same name). A particular work
can have multiple expressions, e.g. different editions, such as Romeo &
Juliet's quarto version of 1597 versus the first folio edition of 1623, which
had far fewer errors and typos). In the FRBR model, translations are
expressions.
With respect to the question at hand, it would seem as if the FRBR model
suggests that if an expression 'concretizes at some time' a work, then it
concretizes that work at all times. Just because a better edition comes out,
doesn't mean the old one ceases to be a concretization of the *work*. Multiple
expressions can realize the same work.
If we want to extend that reasoning to IAs generally, then 'concertizes at some
time' should be merged with 'concretizes at all times'
Larry
Original comment by HunterOn...@gmail.com
on 19 Nov 2012 at 5:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
cmung...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2012 at 10:08