search

zhengj2007 / bfo-export

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bfo
0 stars 0 forks source link

Adjacent_to removed from BFO? #143

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
We had said at some point that it belongs in a spatial ontology. This issue is 
so that we can record an explicit decision about it.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2013 at 5:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
In use: RO_0002220

What would the corrosponding tenporalized version look like? Is there a general 
pattern for how to treat relations that would be symmetric at the bfo-fol level?

The symmetry characteristic would be present in at-some-times, but not 
at-all-times. There may be other temporally qualified variants that are 
stronger for which we can retain transitivity.

Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com on 4 Feb 2013 at 6:00