search

zhengj2007 / bfo-export

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bfo
0 stars 0 forks source link

Review BFO 1.2 proposal with aim of seeing how to more closely align with BFO2 #145

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I have had a first conversation today with James Overton in which we reviewed 
the mapping spreadsheet that James prepared: 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnbOUYWIQYUEdF9yb0hlUjhBUGRnVWNTVFJ
QX0xOUlE#gid=1

Good progress was made in identifying obsolete classes and relations, checking 
the impact on OBI of making them obsolete, an supplying alternative mappings in 
BFO2

In a next meeting we will review the part relations,  the concretizes relation, 
 and the transformation relation as well as any further issues that are raised.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2013 at 6:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
In a second meeting, this time with the OBI developers group we discussed the 
changes to James mapping file, which will be reviewed by more OBI developers. 
We also discussed the strategy of always choosing the part-of-at-all-times 
relation for continuants. It was also claimed that Allen Xiang has software  
that will distinguish continuant from occurrent part-of.  These two choices, 
along with the other mappings would mean that an automatic translation could be 
done. The general sentiment was that this seemed a reasonable approach. 

No final decision was made, and Allen's software needs to be validated.

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 5 Feb 2013 at 4:15