participates in at some time URI re-used with different meaning

[GoogleCodeExporter]

BFO_0000056 was re-used in BFO2 for "participates in at some time". This URI 
was previously used for atemporal participates_in.

I request that BFO2 mints a new URI for this as the meaning may be different 
depending on how atemporal relations are ultimately interpreted.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by cmung...@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 7:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

If we changed the temporalization we would mint a new id anyways. So I think 
should only be evaluated based on the current temporalization.

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 7:12

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I'm not sure I understand.

Basically I would like to keep using BFO_0000056 for "participates in" 
(atemporal). This is problematic at the moment. I don't think it would cause 
too much churn to use a different URI for the temporalized form - I think only 
hdot uses BFO2.

However, if BFO2 really wants to claim BFO_0000056 I will mint a RO ID for the 
atemporal one.

Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 7:20

[GoogleCodeExporter]

To clarify: We generally commit to create new ids when the meaning changes. If 
we used a different temporalization scheme then the meaning would change. 
Therefore there isn't a possibility of the meaning shifting under your feet. 

If one of us has to change ids, it is less churn to change BFO 2.

I think it appropriate, however, to offer at least a plausibility argument 
about why that semantics isn't consistent with the atemporal version.

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 8:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As Jie has verified that RO has already redefined these relations with RO ids, 
We will keep this IRI in BFO.  

(Alan)It is a shame to have this divergence which has no clear benefit.

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 26 Jun 2013 at 8:03

• Changed state: WontFix