Can BFO include 'precedes' and 'preceded by' relations?

zhengj2007 / bfo-export

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bfo

0 stars 0 forks source link

Can BFO include 'precedes' and 'preceded by' relations? #164

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Relations 'precedes' and 'preceded by' have be widely used in OBO Foundry 
community and are generic relations to represent the order of processes. It 
would be nice to be included in BFO version 2.

Current Relation Ontology (dev) uses these relations with BFO IDs assigned in 
BFO pre-Graz version. 
preceded by:
http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=RO&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/B
FO_0000060
precedes:
http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=RO&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/B
FO_0000063

Keep these BFO IDs in BFO version 2 would be easier for existing users.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by zhengj2...@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 8:37

Blocked on: #15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Add Milestone-BFO2-Release label

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 8:57

Added labels: Milestone-BFO2-Release

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 9:11

Now blocked on: #15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Generally happy with this but we should keep in mind scope. Originally the idea 
was to only have those relations required for defining BFO / mentioned in the 
reference. Happy to revisit in the name of practicality though. Given the IDs 
are in use and hopefully uncontroversial makes sense to have them in the BFO2 
release.

What about immediately_preceded_by (RO_0002087)?

Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 11:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Decision: Keep preceded_by and inverse in BFO2, leave immediately_preceded_by 
in RO

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 26 Jun 2013 at 7:48