In the BFO reference the relation located_in is defined in terms of
continuant_part_of (between regions)
DEFINITION [045-001]:
b located_in c at t = Def. b and c are independent continuants, and the region
at which b is located at t is a (proper or improper) continuant_part_of the
region at which c is located at t. [045-001]
However, the axiom
Axiom [047-002]:
if b continuant_part_of c at t and b is an independent continuant, then b is
located_in c at t.
infers location from parthood between continuants. As regions (see above) are
independent continuants, too, this leads to a cycle, as the definition of
location is based on parthood between regions, which implied location between
regions which implies parthood etc. etc.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by steschu@gmail.com on 17 Oct 2013 at 4:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
steschu@gmail.com
on 17 Oct 2013 at 4:37