I think these should be in BFO2 - they are needed and the theory of them has
been circulated and accepted for some time.
But if they are not, then I don't see why they should be discussed in the
reference at all. This leads to confusion over what is and is not in BFO2.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 2:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
alanruttenberg@gmail.com
on 23 May 2012 at 2:02