zhengj2007 / bfo-export

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bfo
0 stars 0 forks source link

Why has material basis only for dispositions #64

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This relation is important also for qualities - for example some qualities 
emerge from the parts things have - typically at a lower level of granularity.

I'm not sure about realizables, but there's an argument to be made that these 
two have material basis - e.g. memory, goal seeking circuits, etc.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 19 Jun 2012 at 6:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This may be due to the fact that 'basis' is reserved in the philosophical 
literature on dispositions to refer to the quality (property) inhering in the 
material entitiy (substance) that gives that material entity the disposition.  

See: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dispositions/#DisCatBas

I think it's two sides of the same coin, but I would label the quality as the 
'qualitative basis' of the disposition:

scoliosis has_material_basis SOME (spine AND has_quality SOME 'bent shape')
scoliosis has_qualitative_basis SOME ('bent shape' AND inheres_in SOME spine)

Original comment by albertgo...@gmail.com on 19 Jun 2012 at 6:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Albert - this is another issue that I hadn't seen. I concur that we may need 
both relations. They are each independent, it would seem. In the simple case of 
OGMS we wanted to use this, essentially, to have a more narrowly target inheres 
relationship. The cloudy eye lens is the disorder which is material basis for 
some blindness causing disease. Before this relation we had only inheres_in. 

knowing the qualitative basis means we know even more independent information, 
so I like it. 

But what I was talking about was, e.g. was a quality like "spotty", applied to 
cell, which have a material basis a number of small granule parts (that have 
different properties from the surrounding material). Or 'spiky' dendrites, 
which have the quality because at a more granular level there are a number of 
'spike' parts - anatomical entities.  

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2 Jul 2012 at 5:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Comment 1 by project member alanruttenberg, Today (3 minutes ago)
hit return too quickly.

So we might write:

spiky dendrite =def dendrite and bearer of (spiky and has material basis some 
spike)
or
(spiky and inheres_in some dendrite) has material basis (spike and part of some 
dendrite) 

Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com on 2 Jul 2012 at 5:36