zhengj2007 / bfo-trunk

0 stars 0 forks source link

Definitions for children of Realizable Entity are proving hard to understand and work with #3

Open zhengj2007 opened 9 years ago

zhengj2007 commented 9 years ago

From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on July 25, 2007 11:53:36

Ongoing discussion on BFO-Discuss needs to make its way into a release of BFO and new definitions written.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=3

zhengj2007 commented 9 years ago

From janna.ha...@gmail.com on April 29, 2012 02:17:29

Alan, what is the status of this issue with respect to BFO 2? If there is still an outstanding, can you clarify the remaining problems?

zhengj2007 commented 9 years ago

From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on May 01, 2012 01:20:43

People find it difficult to make determination of whether realizable entities are functions, dispositions, or roles. Representative http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3228/version/1 Problematic examples: Substrate, Product, reagent

Social roles seem clear, being created only in certain types of processes. Roles of molecules are suspect previous definitions of dispositions characterized them as being lost only when there are structural changes. That wouldn't be true of roles.

There's more, but that's a start.

Labels: -Type-Defect Type-BFO2-Reference

zhengj2007 commented 9 years ago

From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on May 07, 2012 21:12:41

Owner: ifo...@gmail.com

zhengj2007 commented 9 years ago

From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on May 07, 2012 21:37:13

Status: Review-old-issue