Open zhengj2007 opened 9 years ago
zhengj2007
commented
9 years ago From ifo...@gmail.com on May 22, 2012 09:49:33
I am in two minds on this; some of them will be needed, and will be used, by some of BFO users. The proposal had been that we create a wiki page allowing BFO users to create obvious child terms and post them for use by others. We could start this page by listing those terms which still have an obvious potential use but are no longer included in BFO.
zhengj2007
commented
9 years ago From mcour...@gmail.com on May 22, 2012 09:56:01
Could we create an obsolete.owl file (such as it has been done with OBI, IAO...) which would contain those (with annotation as to why they have been deprecated, what is their replacement etc) and leave the choice to users to import or not that file?
zhengj2007
commented
9 years ago From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on May 23, 2012 08:50:39
Status: Accepted
zhengj2007
commented
9 years ago From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on May 24, 2012 19:20:11
Beginnings at https://code.google.com/p/bfo/wiki/BFO_11_to_2_changes Please review/contribute
Status: Started
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on May 22, 2012 00:22:34
There are a number of types that are no longer present. Missing: 'scattered' temporal|spatiotemporal regions, object boundary, processual context , process_aggregate, fiat_process_part, processual_entity (renamed/merged with process).
Shall we call these out as officially obsolete?
Pictures of the two hierarchies are attached to this issue.
Attachment: BFO 1.1.PNG BFO 2.PNG
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=37