zhengj2007
commented
9 years ago From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on May 07, 2012 09:56:10
BFO OWL Working group is now responsible for decisions about this. Relabeling this a BFO2 OWL issue. 1) Nothing to do 2) Part of reference 3) Different process now - we will at least start taking reviews. 4) Nothing to do 5) Different milestone now 6) Review as part of reference task 7) To be discussed. Principle 5.
Labels: -Type-Task Type-BFO2-OWL
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on August 09, 2009 23:56:49
What we need to do between here and there.
1) Decision has already been made on URI - http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_xxxxxx 2) Need to decide on relations to include - first pass Chris to supply Common Logic formulations. At last RO meeting we decided to have separate class and instance level relations. 3) Resolve any outstanding issues we can. Alan will tag such issues in this list as "maybe20" 4) We will assume OWL 2 for the next release 5) Incorporate latest changes on realizable entities. 6) Examples need to be reviewed - some, particularly in realizable entities are poor 7) Solicit feedback from OBO Foundry candidates and other interested parties before release: OBO, IAO, NIF, etc.
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=7