Closed zhengj2007 closed 9 years ago
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on June 29, 2012 13:15:02
Stefan (and alan agrees) that current method is adequate. Let Chris review and close or send mail if he doesn't like it.
Status: Started
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on July 10, 2012 10:25:58
Status: Done
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on July 10, 2012 10:27:22
We will follow this policy
From alanruttenberg@gmail.com on June 28, 2012 11:53:30
Sometimes an axiom in FOL turns into several axioms in OWL, or to a non-equivalent but derivable axiom in OWL (e.g. at-all-times relationship versions).
Thus far I am making the axiom id for all the OWL axioms be the same as the FOL axiom id.
The question is should I do that? Or should there be an additional relation to record this and a distinct id for the OWL axiom?
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=77