Closed zhanjw closed 2 years ago
Hi, your results are right.
The mean, max, and std in the first line actually mean post-processing methods. That is to say, the anomaly localization result is an anomaly map with the shape of H x W. We need to convert this map to a scalar as the anomaly score for this whole image. For this convert, you have three options.
In our paper, we use max for MVTec-AD and use mean for CIFAR-10.
Another question, why mean is so poor for screw? This is because: For screw, the area of fore-ground region is too small. Using mean for post-processing takes too many irrelevant back-ground regions into consideration. Thus mean is obviously not a good solution for screw.
Therefore, your final results should be 96.9 for localization and 97.4 for detection, even better than our paper (We use 8 GPUs whose results are usually poorer than 1 or 2 GPUs).
Also, we will add the explanation of mean, max, std to README.
作者,你好,我们在MVTecAD上利用论文里面的设置,bs=64,backbone选为efficientnet_b4,然而当用mean_max_auc作为key_metric的时候,利用1000个epoch里面保存的ckpt_best.pth.tar,得到的性能指标如下,很多指标都达不到论文的指标,请问这是为什么呀,期盼您的回答。
Using the configuration you have given
the configuration does not contain
I added it and tried to reproduce it
mean AUROC seems a bit low, especially for screw
Are there any tips for training? or anything I should be aware of?