Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Yes, a design choice I regret. You can fix this my marking the member as
required (an option on the ProtoMember or DataMember). I might well add a
global switch for this is v2, allowing for v1 behaviour (implicit defaults),
but defaulting to: Not
Original comment by marc.gravell
on 29 Jun 2011 at 5:18
Thanks for your comments. A global switch would be perfect.
Original comment by praveen....@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2011 at 5:57
Well for v2 it be nice for us to have such an option (if we ever switch that is)
We use protobuf-net to minimize traffic when using WCF (and to enforce a
certain strictness), so we'd prefer the v1 behavior.
Original comment by tim@mylemans.com
on 4 Jul 2011 at 8:20
Original comment by marc.gravell
on 12 Jul 2011 at 7:33
Added, as UseImplicitZeroDefaults on RuntimeTypeModel
Original comment by marc.gravell
on 12 Jul 2011 at 8:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
praveen....@gmail.com
on 29 Jun 2011 at 4:56