Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Fixed in SVN, will be fixed in 2.6.2.1 release.
Original comment by mom040...@gmail.com
on 27 Aug 2013 at 1:38
I actually discovered that, as written, RFC 6062 cannot be 100% correctly
supported on any modern "official" Linuxes prior to kernel 3.9.
The problem is that pre-3.9 Linuxes do not support SO_REUSEPORT option, see
explanations here:
https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14388706/socket-options-so-reuseaddr-and-so-r
euseport-how-do-they-differ-do-they-mean-t
In section 5.2 of RFC 6062: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6062#page-9
they require that all TCP connections initiated from the relay endpoint must
have the same local address as the relay endpoint. Considering that we already
have a relay endpoint socket listening on that address, this is simply
impossible with "normal" socket API in Linux. We cannot start a new remote
connection with a new client socket when we have a local server socket on the
same local address.
For this sort of functionality, we need SO_REUSEPORT option support. This
option is correctly supported currently only on the following OSes:
1) BSD (FreeBSD, PC-BSD, etc).
2) Mac OS X
3) Latest Linux kernels 3.9+
This TURN server, starting with version 2.6.2.1, will correctly support RFC
6062 for those platforms. For others, we do not support the requirement in the
section 5.2.
The turnserver.sourceforge.net supports the 5.2 requirement, but it pays a big
price for that: it imposes a limitation that if we have a connection initiated,
then we cannot have other TCP connections for the session - neither incoming
nor outgoing. But RFC 6062 does not impose any limitation on the number of
session connections.
Original comment by mom040...@gmail.com
on 2 Sep 2013 at 10:16
Fixed in 2.6.2.1
Original comment by mom040...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2013 at 7:12
I fixed the problem for pre-3.9 Linux kernel, too.
Original comment by mom040...@gmail.com
on 7 Sep 2013 at 4:33
The full fix is available in SVN and will be part of 2.6.2.2 and later builds.
Original comment by mom040...@gmail.com
on 7 Sep 2013 at 4:34
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mom040...@gmail.com
on 27 Aug 2013 at 1:36