Open Alihanan opened 3 months ago
The initial point theta is important for stable estimation. Although there are potentially different strategies, this is the intended implementation.
On Jun 2, 2024, at 2:59 PM, Alihanan @.***> wrote:
Based on my observation ,the following parts of the zipath_fit(...) function:
if(family=="negbin" && theta.fixed) {
if(is.null(init.theta)){
# init.theta <- fit0$theta #} Xtmp <- X Ztmp <- Z X <- as.matrix(X[,1]) Z <- as.matrix(Z[,1]) kx <- 1 kz <- 1
find the solution of estimates for the intercept-only model with fixed init.theta; what about offset?
fit0.nb <- optim(fn = ziNegBin2, gr = gradfun, par = c(fit0$coef$count, fit0$coef$zero), #if(dist == "negbin") log(start$theta) else NULL), method = "Nelder-Mead", hessian = FALSE, control = list(fnscale=-1)) fit0$coefficients <- list(count=fit0.nb$par[1], zero=fit0.nb$par[2]) fit0$theta <- init.theta X <- Xtmp Z <- Ztmp kx <- NCOL(X) kz <- NCOL(Z)
} ....
start <- list(count = model_count$coefficients, zero = model_zero$coefficients) vcov <- vector("list", length=nlambda) if(family == "negbin"){
if(!theta.fixed)
# start$theta <- fit0$theta #else start$theta <- init.theta
} if(is.null(start$theta)) start$theta <- 1 always set the theta coefficient to 1 if theta.fixed=TRUE and overwrites the start (zero and count) values to be that of zeroinfl run with init.theta.
Is this the intended behavior or the functionality is yet to be implemented? I do apologize if it was described elsewhere
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zhuwang46/mpath/issues/10, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALGS6SFLS7A6YKAVIWZJMQLZFN2QJAVCNFSM6AAAAABIVKKNO2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGMZDSOBTHAZDQNA. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Based on my observation ,the following parts of the
zipath_fit(...)
function:....
always set the theta coefficient to 1 if
theta.fixed=TRUE
and overwrites the start (zero and count) values to be that of zeroinfl run withinit.theta
.Is this the intended behavior or the functionality is yet to be implemented? I do apologize if it was described elsewhere