Based on a scour-discuss conversation with Dan Morrill:
On 5/16/07, Chris Prince wrote:
> > google.gears.create() --vs-- google.gears.factory.create()
>
> Yeah, I was thinking about this too. It does seem much cleaner.
>
> We would need to consider what it means for workers, where the
> containing workerpool is exposed as "google.gears.workerpool". Now
> "google.gears" is not a factory; it is just a namespace that contains
> create(), a core method. Does that matter?
>
> > why is getBuildInfo() a function and not a read-only property?
>
> No good reason -- just legacy. A property would make sense.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by gears.te...@gmail.com on 11 Jun 2007 at 3:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
gears.te...@gmail.com
on 11 Jun 2007 at 3:53