Open andrewrk opened 5 years ago
Related to https://github.com/ziglang/zig/pull/2978, what's the current thinking on handling targets not supported by existing CI services (eg: NetBSD, OpenBSD, ARM, etc.)?
GitHub Actions look like they could actually be a good way forward as you can run an agent on your own server - whether the agent will support NetBSD/OpenBSD/other platforms is a mystery right now though...
Obviously actions would need configuring, but that's no big deal really.
I know that Nim got some Digital Ocean credit given to them as an open source project to let them host their site and such - possibly worth looking into that kind of thing if we need to start running agents.
@cryo
Probably the best approach is to add NetBSD to sr.ht, for general benefit.
Probably the best approach is to add NetBSD to sr.ht, for general benefit.
Not sure if you've already seen the call for assistance here: https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sr.ht-dev/%3CBXW5IXAF5BP2.2BHCF8T5SOU75%40homura%3E
Reopened due to 3063f0a5ed373947badd0af056db310283c76e37
Did this get closed again with https://github.com/ziglang/zig/commit/3e8394776a920be1a3c68b3e622011bca450b3a7 ?
This issue should be reopened until the LLVM regression described in https://github.com/ziglang/zig-bootstrap/issues/71 is solved
Zig currently uses sr.ht for FreeBSD CI. Although it does not have Tier 1 Support yet (#1759) at least the behavior tests are run in various configurations. See the file
.builds/freebsd.yml
.~sr.ht also has support for NetBSD and so it would be pretty straightforward to get some level of CI testing for NetBSD going.~ It seems sr.ht dropped support