codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Base: 98.52% // Head: 98.52% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% :tada:
Coverage data is based on head (
adf6df7) compared to base (36c5d09). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## dev #203 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 98.52% 98.52% ======================================= Files 43 43 Lines 3799 3803 +4 ======================================= + Hits 3743 3747 +4 Misses 56 56 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/zigpy/zigpy-znp/pull/203?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zigpy) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [zigpy\_znp/api.py](https://codecov.io/gh/zigpy/zigpy-znp/pull/203?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zigpy#diff-emlncHlfem5wL2FwaS5weQ==) | `96.95% <100.00%> (+0.24%)` | :arrow_up: | | [zigpy\_znp/zigbee/application.py](https://codecov.io/gh/zigpy/zigpy-znp/pull/203?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zigpy#diff-emlncHlfem5wL3ppZ2JlZS9hcHBsaWNhdGlvbi5weQ==) | `94.80% <100.00%> (-0.24%)` | :arrow_down: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zigpy). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zigpy):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'request_callback_rsp'makes it sound like there is a library bug.