Closed awoods closed 3 years ago
The URN-3 scheme requires urn:
prefix, so I think your example should be urn:URN-3:HUL.DRS.OBJECT:100775205
per https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-3
Having said that, the syntax for URI schemes as defined in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986.html#section-3.1 is:
scheme = ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )
so URN-3:HUL.DRS.OBJECT:100775205
should be accepted as a URI.
OCFL objects with an
id
such as: "URN-3:HUL.DRS.OBJECT:100775205", are flagged as validation warnings. I believe these should be valid.. as URNs are valid URIs and the above URN-3 scheme is a valid URN.See: https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-informal/urn-3