PythonFZ
commented
4 months ago @CodiumAI-Agent /review
Closed PythonFZ closed 4 months ago
PythonFZ
commented
4 months ago @CodiumAI-Agent /review
CodiumAI-Agent
commented
4 months ago π‘ General suggestions: The changes made in this PR are valuable as they improve the clarity and readability of the documentation. The updated code examples are more accurate and reflect the current state of the project. However, it would be beneficial to ensure that all the code examples in the documentation are tested to ensure they work as expected.
| relevant file | docs/source/_get-started/api_classes.rst |
| suggestion | **It would be helpful to include a brief explanation of what `zntrack.params()` and `zntrack.outs()` do in the context of the code example. This will provide more context to the reader and make the documentation more informative. [medium]** |
| relevant line | a = zntrack.params() |
| relevant file | docs/source/_get-started/index.rst |
| suggestion | **Consider breaking down the long sentences into shorter ones for better readability. Also, try to avoid passive voice where possible to make the text more engaging. [medium]** |
| relevant line | ZnTrack is designed to build workflows, track parameters, and keep a record of associated outputs and metrics. |
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the code feedback section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
About the 'Code feedback' sectionThe `review` tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions. If you are interested **only** in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the [`improve`](./IMPROVE.md) feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results. Use the `review` tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well. |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_review`, `enable_review_labels_effort`, and more. |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
CodiumAI-Agent
commented
4 months ago | β±οΈ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 2, because the PR primarily involves documentation changes and minor code adjustments in examples. The changes are straightforward and do not involve complex logic or architectural modifications. |
| π§ͺ Relevant tests | No |
| π Possible issues | No |
| π Security concerns | No |
| relevant file | docs/source/_get-started/api_classes.rst |
| suggestion | Consider adding a brief explanation or example of how `zntrack.params_path()` and `zntrack.outs_path()` can be used in practice. This would provide clarity to users on when and why to use these methods over the more automatic `zntrack.params()` and `zntrack.outs()`. [important] |
| relevant line | Alternatively, you can use the ``zntrack.params_path()`` and ``zntrack.outs_path()`` to define the paths to the respective files. |
| relevant file | docs/source/_get-started/index.rst |
| suggestion | It might be beneficial to include a simple example or code snippet in this introductory section to immediately engage the reader with a practical illustration of ZnTrack's capabilities. This can help in grasping the basic concepts more effectively. [medium] |
| relevant line | The following sections will guide you through the basic concepts of ZnTrack and how to use it. |
| relevant file | docs/source/index.rst |
| suggestion | Given the introduction of DVC links, it would be helpful to briefly mention how ZnTrack integrates with DVC or complements its features, especially for readers who might be familiar with DVC but new to ZnTrack. This could enhance the understanding of ZnTrack's value proposition. [medium] |
| relevant line | .. _DVC: https://dvc.org/ |
| relevant file | docs/source/index.rst |
| suggestion | To make the documentation more engaging and visually appealing, consider adding a few screenshots or diagrams that illustrate the workflow or the concept of Nodes in ZnTrack. Visual aids can significantly improve comprehension and retention of information. [medium] |
| relevant line | ZnTrack is designed to simplify code sharing and reproducibility. |
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more. |
Auto-approve PRsBy invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ``` |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
PythonFZ
commented
4 months ago @CodiumAI-Agent /improve
CodiumAI-Agent
commented
4 months ago | Category | Suggestions |
| Enhancement |
Add an example or explanation of automatic serialization with
___
**Consider adding a brief explanation or example of how Python objects are automatically |
Add an explanation or example for
___
**To improve readability and understanding, consider adding a brief explanation or example | |
Clarify the roles of
___
**It's recommended to add a brief explanation about the difference between | |
Add an overview of ZnTrack's key features and benefits.___ **To enhance the introduction of ZnTrack, consider adding a brief overview of its keyfeatures and benefits. This can help new users quickly grasp the value proposition of ZnTrack.** [docs/source/index.rst [20-22]](https://github.com/zincware/ZnTrack/pull/757/files#diff-4eec6cec5f6fab1548b85433ea8ca81315ae165db4b7f84019f287df9015699fR20-R22) ```diff Welcome to ZnTrack, the first developer package from zincware | |
Clarify the role of
___
**To ensure clarity and consistency, consider revising the explanation of the |
Enabling\disabling automationWhen you first install the app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the improve tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...] ``` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically. |
Utilizing extra instructionsExtra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
A note on code suggestions quality- While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. - Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. - Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the [custom suggestions :gem:](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/CUSTOM_SUGGESTIONS.md) tool - With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode. |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
CodiumAI-Agent
commented
4 months ago π‘ [enhancement]
Consider using zntrack.Param and zntrack.Out instead of zntrack.params() and zntrack.outs() for better readability and consistency with Python's standard attribute declaration style.
File: docs/source/_get-started/api_classes.rst (22-33)
π‘ [enhancement]
Consider using zntrack.Param and zntrack.Out instead of zntrack.params() and zntrack.outs() for better readability and consistency with Python's standard attribute declaration style.
File: docs/source/_get-started/project.rst (10-24)
π‘ [readability]
Consider splitting the long sentence into shorter ones for better readability.
File: docs/source/index.rst (20-22)
π‘ [enhancement]
Consider using zntrack.Param and zntrack.Out instead of zntrack.params() and zntrack.outs() for better readability and consistency with Python's standard attribute declaration style.
File: docs/source/index.rst (55-64)
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #757 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 91.06% 91.06% ======================================= Files 25 25 Lines 2059 2059 Branches 979 979 ======================================= Hits 1875 1875 Misses 184 184 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/zincware/ZnTrack/pull/757/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zincware) | Coverage Ξ | | |---|---|---| | [fulltest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/zincware/ZnTrack/pull/757/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zincware) | `86.83% <ΓΈ> (ΓΈ)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zincware#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.