PythonFZ
commented
4 months ago @CodiumAI-Agent /review
Closed PythonFZ closed 4 months ago
PythonFZ
commented
4 months ago @CodiumAI-Agent /review
CodiumAI-Agent
commented
4 months ago π‘ General suggestions: The changes in this PR seem to be well thought out and follow best practices for managing dependencies with poetry in a ReadTheDocs environment. The comments explaining the changes are also helpful.
| relevant file | .readthedocs.yaml |
| suggestion | **Consider pinning the poetry version to ensure consistent builds. [medium]** |
| relevant line | - pip install poetry |
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the code feedback section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
About the 'Code feedback' sectionThe `review` tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions. If you are interested **only** in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the [`improve`](./IMPROVE.md) feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results. Use the `review` tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well. |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_review`, `enable_review_labels_effort`, and more. |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
CodiumAI-Agent
commented
4 months ago | β±οΈ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 2, because the PR involves configuration changes in the .readthedocs.yaml file, which are straightforward to review. The changes are focused on the build process and do not involve complex logic or code changes. |
| π§ͺ Relevant tests | No |
| π Possible issues | Possible Bug: The `VIRTUAL_ENV` environment variable is being manually set before running `poetry install`. If the `READTHEDOCS_VIRTUALENV_PATH` variable is not correctly set or updated by ReadTheDocs, this could lead to unexpected behavior or build failures. |
| π Security concerns | No |
| relevant file | .readthedocs.yaml |
| suggestion | Consider verifying if `READTHEDOCS_VIRTUALENV_PATH` is always correctly set by ReadTheDocs in all scenarios. If there's any case where it might not be set or updated, consider adding a fallback or an error message to avoid silent failures. [important] |
| relevant line | - VIRTUAL_ENV=$READTHEDOCS_VIRTUALENV_PATH poetry install --with docs |
| relevant file | .readthedocs.yaml |
| suggestion | Ensure that the `poetry install --with docs` command includes all necessary dependency groups for building the documentation. If there are other groups besides `docs` that are essential, consider specifying them explicitly. [medium] |
| relevant line | - VIRTUAL_ENV=$READTHEDOCS_VIRTUALENV_PATH poetry install --with docs |
| relevant file | .readthedocs.yaml |
| suggestion | Since you're manually installing poetry via pip, ensure that the version of poetry installed is compatible with the project's requirements. Consider pinning the poetry version to avoid potential incompatibilities with future releases. [medium] |
| relevant line | - pip install poetry |
| relevant file | .readthedocs.yaml |
| suggestion | To improve readability and maintainability, consider adding comments explaining why `VIRTUAL_ENV` needs to be set manually, especially since this is a workaround for a current limitation. This will help future maintainers understand the context behind this decision. [medium] |
| relevant line | # VIRTUAL_ENV needs to be set manually for now. |
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/Usage.md#github-app-automatic-tools) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/docs/REVIEW.md#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more. |
Auto-approve PRsBy invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ``` |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #782 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 91.06% 91.06% ======================================= Files 25 25 Lines 2059 2059 Branches 979 979 ======================================= Hits 1875 1875 Misses 184 184 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/zincware/ZnTrack/pull/782/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zincware) | Coverage Ξ | | |---|---|---| | [fulltest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/zincware/ZnTrack/pull/782/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zincware) | `86.83% <ΓΈ> (ΓΈ)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=zincware#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.