Open juanky201271 opened 2 days ago
Really nice work!
I'd like to work out a road map where eventually all of these states are scripted in an emulator and asserted to be correct.
I think detox tests might permit that?
@Edicksonjga @juanky201271 @dorianvp
Can we meet to discuss the work that remains to get to that point for our test harness?
I see this as a cross-repo concern.
I believe we need to have automated tests running on an emulated app that verify the state of each of these flows. (In zingo-mobile?)
I believe that these issues should properly be fixed in zingolib.
i am sure, based on edicksonz results, that 3 and 4 are due to #1437
I see this as a cross-repo concern.
I believe we need to have automated tests running on an emulated app that verify the state of each of these flows. (In zingo-mobile?)
I believe that these issues should properly be fixed in zingolib.
I'm working on e2e test for those flows... in zingo-mobile.
about the number 1 issue I noticed something interesting... 2 different scenarios:
refund
address.send-to-self
transaction and you DO NOT see the refund
addresses at all.I hope this make sense to someone... @zancas @fluidvanadium @AloeareV
refund
transparent addresses in the Value Transfers List instead asend-to-self
transaction without address.@Edicksonjga Maybe you have more or another issues...