Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
For 2nd point please take a look at issue #38. There is a patch which
implements the first part of your request (script's basename as script id). If
it's OK for you to use a static DB name encoded in the script's filename (and
not extracted dynamically from the actual DB connection properties), you may go
ahead with this patch.
Suggested implementation allows other VersionExtractor's implementations to be
easily added. However, I know nothing about any plans either would this change
be accepted upstream.
Original comment by mykola.nickishov
on 8 Sep 2010 at 6:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
5269228.CAMOBAP@gmail.com
on 5 Sep 2010 at 11:42