The case of the two new functions readfullweights and applyfullweights! to be included in release 3.0 does not match the camel-case standard used for other functions:
ringWeightPath
readWeightRing
pixelWindowPath
readPixelWindowT
etc.
Although the common practice in Julia is to use all-lowercase identifier, I believe the least disruptive change would be to convert to CamelCase the two functions, i.e., readFullWeights and applyFullWeights!.
I think changing those functions to camel case would be fine -- the package is currently split into "foo2bar" and camel case methods, and I think that is ok. Makes sense to enforce consistency!
The case of the two new functions
readfullweights
andapplyfullweights!
to be included in release 3.0 does not match the camel-case standard used for other functions:ringWeightPath
readWeightRing
pixelWindowPath
readPixelWindowT
Although the common practice in Julia is to use all-lowercase identifier, I believe the least disruptive change would be to convert to CamelCase the two functions, i.e.,
readFullWeights
andapplyFullWeights!
.@xzackli, what do you think?