Closed eskaur closed 1 year ago
If we change this then we should also change the C++ API to make a Matrix4x4 ctor that takes a pose, for consistency? (Also .NET possibly)? And I am not sure if that is correct thing to do since Matrix4x4 is a more basic primitive than a Pose, so Matrix should not know too much about Pose's?
The first code line (existing code) did not feel like too much coding?
If we change this then we should also change the C++ API to make a Matrix4x4 ctor that takes a pose, for consistency? (Also .NET possibly)? And I am not sure if that is correct thing to do since Matrix4x4 is a more basic primitive than a Pose, so Matrix should not know too much about Pose's?
The first code line (existing code) did not feel like too much coding?
You make good points. This was merely a mockup because the feature was requested by CSU. I am fine with not merging this :)
Functions such as
DetectionResult.pose()
return aPose
, not a numpy array. The user may want to save this pose to file, which could only be done by:This commit makes the process easier by enabling: