Closed snayfach closed 5 years ago
thanks, snp_dict.tsv was updated and could be downloaded and used to yield chrom and local position without changing ways to calling parser
Thanks - I assume it is 1-indexed rather than 0-indexed. Can you confirm?
Sorry if it sounds confusing, but they are 0-indexed for both global and local positions.
Not confusing. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:10 PM Zhou (Jason) Shi notifications@github.com wrote:
Sorry if it sounds confusing, but they are 0-indexed for both global and local positions.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zjshi/gt-pro2.0/issues/2#issuecomment-463443022, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACAbrRCPNKGSRnDb05me0bfjMuwGdQUhks5vNLdvgaJpZM4a1Wgm .
1-indexed positions are a bit more standard for public consumption, but works fine for me :)
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:10 PM Stephen Nayfach snayfach@gmail.com wrote:
Not confusing. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:10 PM Zhou (Jason) Shi notifications@github.com wrote:
Sorry if it sounds confusing, but they are 0-indexed for both global and local positions.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zjshi/gt-pro2.0/issues/2#issuecomment-463443022, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACAbrRCPNKGSRnDb05me0bfjMuwGdQUhks5vNLdvgaJpZM4a1Wgm .
I see, thanks for the point, I will make it clear in documents all positions are 0 indexed. I would also do an assessment when I have more time later to see how costly it is to transform 0 indexed files to 1 indexed ones.
head snp_dict.tsv
species_id pos ref alt
206814 23513 G A 206814 23774 G A 206814 25401 T G 206814 25618 G C
I was expecting a
chrom
column indicating the contig on which a SNP is found. Otherwise I don't know where each SNP is found relative to the representative genome. This is useful for me personally so I can match (a) the true genotype of a new genome versus (b) the predicted genotype based on the output of gtproMaybe this information is contained in the parsed output. I will try running the tool to see