Closed TuanTNG closed 1 year ago
We will release our code at the end of June. Thanks for your following.
Hi @xuanlanxingkongxia, Thank you for your reply.
By the way, I have a question related to inference speed. May you help to compare the inference speed of your model with LoFTR?
It takes about 1 second for pats to match a pair of image, which is 10 times of LoFTR, while it is much faster than COTR and comparable with PDCNet+
Thank you,
I got it. Looking forward to seeing your code.
In detail for our time and space efficiency: PATS (900ms) is slower than LoFTR (64ms) but comparable with PDC-Net+ (850ms) when processing 640×480 images. Besides, PATS (5.0GB) occupies more memory than LoFTR (3.6GB) but less memory than PDC-Net+(5.6GB). However, thanks to the scale-adaptive subdivision, for 1600×1200 images, PATS (8.3GB) consumes less memory than LoFTR (22GB) and PDC-Net+(23GB).
All of the tests are conducted on RTX 3090
@xuanlanxingkongxia hello, any update about the code release?
Sorry for the delay. We have released the evaluation code and the pre-trained model. We are still working on the release of the training script, which is expected to appear at the end of this year.
Hi, Thank you so much for your awesome work. When will you release your code?