Proposed contribution: Make explicit considerations for settings with concurrency. For example, do the prover and verifier know in which session they are interacting? Consider mentioning the possible use of session ids. How to ensure non-malleability?
See review-comment PEC5 from 2020.
Locations in ZkpComRef-0.2 to revise: sub-section 1.6.5.
The effect of "concurrency" should also be revisited in the chapters of implementation and applications.
Proposed contribution: Make explicit considerations for settings with concurrency. For example, do the prover and verifier know in which session they are interacting? Consider mentioning the possible use of session ids. How to ensure non-malleability?
Related locations: Chapter 1 (security/theory)
Proposed contributors: needs contributors
Contribution context: proposed in the "NIST comments on the initial ZKProof documentation" (April 06, 2019) --- item C8.