Closed luisbran closed 4 years ago
I would like to work on this contribution.
Thanks, Hasini.
IM willing to be part of this !
I have invited both of you to the contributors team, as soon as you accept we will assign this issue to both of you. Looking forward to the contribution!
Thanks @daniben31. I have accepted it.
For the record, @DecentrilizedMan just submitted an initial document:
Proposed contribution: The “security/theory” track is mentioning Boolean circuits but not R1CS. The “implementation” track is focused on R1CS without explaining why/when it is preferable to a circuit representation. Consider explaining better (in the “security” track) what is R1CS. Consider introducing and exemplifying a circuit-to-R1CS translation and/or vice-versa. Consider clarifying better in the “implementation” track why the focus is on R1CS, for example compared with circuits.
Related locations: Chapters 1 (security/theory) and 2 (implementation)
Proposed contributors: Needs contributors
Contribution context: Proposed in the "NIST comments on the initial ZKProof documentation" (April 06, 2019) --- item C10.