Closed zktuong closed 7 months ago
Attention: 1 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
c90d6bf
) 72.49% compared to head (b9a3354
) 73.03%.
hmm i think it's doing the thing where it's pulling in non-relevant interactions...
doesn't solve the issue of pulling non-significant interactions
ah ok that's not the issue. changing it to
df <- df %>%
dplyr::filter(!is.na(cellsign))
will retrieve the results, but this defeats the purpose of the cellsign filtering. so i need to add another check in the steps that if the significant interaction was removed, then just remove that entire LR.
this is causing issue at #101