Closed breynders-cb closed 1 month ago
IMO having ETSI/PKIO lint buckets would be great for zlint, as long as they can be continuously maintained. We did have a set of lints but they had some bugs and I think several of them were removed.
100% agree. Scope wise, very much would like to see these in ZLint. The bigger question is whether there's sufficient community to contribute these lints and to review them.
Thanks for the response! If we get started we'll be in touch through properly scoped issue or PR.
Internally we'll be going to extending a linter (1 or more) with additional rules to check all cases relevant to our use case. We're a QTSP in the Netherlands and are interested in linting a very specific certificate profile, namely a certificate for natural person qualified signatures (G4 Individual Validated eSig).
Other than some pkio (Dutch government pki) rules it's mostly a combination of common rulesets and ETSI rules, namely
NCP+ (0.4.0.2042.1.2)
andQCP-n-qscd (0.4.0.194112.1.2)
.Is there interest in having these rules (partially) merged back upstream? How would you suggest structuring such rules in the current codebase?