Today I double check the original paper proposing wgan-gp.I found your model architecture is quietly different from original paper's where it is called cifar-10 ResNet architecture.
What's the most obvious is that there is no BN layer and and ReLu activation is used instead of Leaky-Relu activation.
Could you tell me why you use your custom-defined architecture rather than cifar-10 ResNet architecture?
Thanks!
What's the most obvious is that there is no BN layer and and ReLu activation is used instead of Leaky-Relu activation. Could you tell me why you use your custom-defined architecture rather than cifar-10 ResNet architecture? Thanks!