Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Please patch the w32 code for these rates too and I will commit this.
Original comment by ge...@spacevs.com
on 10 Nov 2011 at 10:45
I would really like to patch and test the w32 code but I do not have a machine
capable of even compiling.
The serial subsystem was designed well so that the rates could be partially
implemented. I noticed already that the two serial implementations are
different since w32 does has the 1800 commented out.
I attached a patch that has the new baud rates commented out for w32.
Original comment by bolms...@gmail.com
on 11 Nov 2011 at 5:05
Attachments:
Excellent, thanks, I will apply this shortly, will see if we can get someone
under linux to test these baud rates.
Original comment by ge...@spacevs.com
on 24 Dec 2011 at 3:17
I can confirm that this patch seems to work. I was able to download code to my
system at 460400.
Original comment by reubendowle0@gmail.com
on 5 Jan 2012 at 10:15
In absence of the maintainer, I have set up a git repository where I will try
to incorporate all outstanding patches:
https://gitorious.org/stm32flash/stm32flash#more
I applied this patch in the issue10 branch. Please provide a name/address that
I can use as commit author (and Tested-by: if possible).
Original comment by lists.to...@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2012 at 8:43
Sorry I meant the issue17 branch at
https://gitorious.org/stm32flash/stm32flash/commits/issue17
Original comment by lists.to...@gmail.com
on 17 Nov 2012 at 8:43
I merged this into my "merging" branch and tested successfully reading from
flash with 2000000 baud on Linux and 115200 baud on Windows 7, over a CP2102
USB UART. That was quite a speed improvement, thanks!
Original comment by lists.to...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2012 at 8:28
This has now been fixed in the official repository and is included in version
0.3beta2.
Original comment by lists.to...@gmail.com
on 9 Dec 2013 at 11:12
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bolms...@gmail.com
on 6 Nov 2011 at 3:31Attachments: