Closed GallegoSav closed 2 months ago
Some modifications in the code in order to prevent non physical results for the activation. It is mainly about 2 parts :
First , a issue with the version geant4 1v1.01 that i reported here : https://geant4-forum.web.cern.ch/t/isotope-lifetimes-from-g4iontable-are-strange-or-have-a-value-of-0-s/10448 All the modification with G4Ions::G4FloatLevelBase::... are due to this issue . It will be probably corrected with the next patch.
G4Ions::G4FloatLevelBase::...
Second , the fact that I did not use correctly the method FinalExcitationIndex from the class G4NucLevel which lead to the wrong energy for the de-excitation gammas.
FinalExcitationIndex
G4NucLevel
-Also I had to modified MCCrossSections.cc (see the message of the commit https://github.com/zoglauer/megalib/pull/80/commits/00f94b4d314272d9118493a8484b10a703915826 and the pdf crosssection.pdf
)
Some modifications in the code in order to prevent non physical results for the activation. It is mainly about 2 parts :
First , a issue with the version geant4 1v1.01 that i reported here : https://geant4-forum.web.cern.ch/t/isotope-lifetimes-from-g4iontable-are-strange-or-have-a-value-of-0-s/10448 All the modification with
G4Ions::G4FloatLevelBase::...are due to this issue . It will be probably corrected with the next patch.Second , the fact that I did not use correctly the method
FinalExcitationIndexfrom the classG4NucLevelwhich lead to the wrong energy for the de-excitation gammas.-Also I had to modified MCCrossSections.cc (see the message of the commit https://github.com/zoglauer/megalib/pull/80/commits/00f94b4d314272d9118493a8484b10a703915826 and the pdf crosssection.pdf
)