Closed DarrenMcRoy closed 9 years ago
Please, change at least these ones:
The others may remain the same they are. Some of them are very confusing and doesn't look like the creature usually appears. Thanks!!
It would indeed make sense to use the images of the field guide (which are supposed to be the most representative; otherwise they need to be changed in the field guide itself).
My opinion on which image to pick is (numbering from left to right):
@yshish , what do you think? (I really would welcome your opinion in particular for the California only groups!).
My suggestions; I tried to choose the most common displays (considering both locations). The ones we agreed on are bold:
What do you think?
Alright - here are my selections, taking into acct @jiho and @yshish's suggestions. If I can get final say then these are the selections. I biased this list towards not changing things that I don't think needs changing, unless both jiho and yshish agreed upon the change.
Let's use the final list by Jessica.
We are! :-)
Updated images are now appearing on the site in the classification interface.
The images as examples that pop up when one does a mouse-over in the classification interface are still the images from the old field guide, the ones that Zuzi says are not very useful. (Except for the ones that are of new categories.)
Could we update them from new images from the new field guide? (Probably without the size marker?)
@heathv would probably have to generate those images without the size-marker.