icemac
commented
7 months ago @rawwerks You could create a PR where visit_MatMult calls return self.node_contents_visit(node) like the other binary operators.
It is currently not allowed, because there was no use-case, yet, and we were not able to come up with example code for the tests: There seems to be no usage in plain Python.
rawwerks
hi! i'm sorry if this isn't the right place to ask this question, but i couldn't find anywhere else that the cool RestrictedPython people hang out.
i'm using a python package that is basically a domain-specific language, and one of the features of the language is overwriting
@to have a specific definition.after failing repeatedly to do a workaround where i overwrite
@with AST before getting the safe code, i think i need to find a way to allow___matmult___(or more accurately, allow the@to be in the code)what would be the recommended way to do this?
the simplest way i can think of is to fork the repo & change this line to allow the node to be visited. https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/blob/821ea97f20327d8e549a42517f9dfbe500903440/src/RestrictedPython/transformer.py#L770
for both safety and maintainability, i would prefer to avoid changing the source code if possible.
is there a more elegant way to tell restrictedpython that it needs to allow
@? can i add a@function to the safe_globals that just passes the symbol through?to clarify once again - i don't need
___matmult___, i need restrictedpython to allow the@so i can use the package-specific definition of the@symbol.