Closed tdesvenain closed 3 years ago
Hi, before cleaning up this implementation and adding tests, i'd like to get your opinion about the way i fix the issue.
@tdesvenain Sorry, I do not understand the problem. Maybe a test could show what you want to achieve. (BTW I am using sources instead of vocabularies all the time.)
@tdesvenain What is the current status of this PR?
I have to write the unit tests
@tdesvenain wrote:
I have to write the unit tests
Okay, nice. Please ask if you have questions about the tests.
@tdesvenain Could you please rebase on master, too, so we get coverage measurement for this PR.
@tdesvenain I redirected the PR to the new 3.x
branch, as I closed 3.2.x
in favour of it.
Is this PR still valid or should we close it?
refs issue #59