Closed pinpan closed 3 years ago
Customers using APIML could have also installed some extensions, no matter if from the community or proprietary.
Currently the extensions would not be reinstalled/activated after APIML reisntallation (what types and conditions?).
The aim of the spike si to propose an approach how to keep track of what extensions are installed/depoyed/active and restage them.
The compatibility of the individual extensions with the new APIML version should be validated as well.
Customer should be warned in case some extensions can't be restaged.
Importancy (or fetaures level) of the extensions for runningg APIML must be maintained.
Wrong board.
pinpan
commented
3 years ago pinpan
commented
3 years ago
Customers using APIML could have also installed some extensions, no matter if from the community or proprietary.
Currently the extensions would not be reinstalled/activated after APIML reisntallation (what types and conditions?).
The aim of the spike si to propose an approach how to keep track of what extensions are installed/depoyed/active and restage them.
The compatibility of the individual extensions with the new APIML version should be validated as well.
Customer should be warned in case some extensions can't be restaged.
Importancy (or fetaures level) of the extensions for runningg APIML must be maintained.